|
The descriptors below will be used in assessing the final presentations for the Astronomy Project. A score sheet that follows the same layout as the descriptors will be generated and will be used when assessing the actual presentations.
|
|
|
|
Goals |
|
|
A multimedia product presented key information very effectively |
Quality of images, titles and information was excellent |
Highly effective flow from beginning to middle to end |
Science was accurate and complete; communication was very effective |
Top notch, high quality presentation that was very pleasant to watch and very informative |
|
Included a multimedia product that presented key information |
Images were clear; titles and information could be read and followed |
Clear beginning, middle and end to the presentation |
Science was accurate; communication was effective |
Good presentation, good information |
|
Included a multimedia product, but didn't contribute to presentation |
Images were generally clear; but titles and information were difficult to read and follow |
Unclear beginning, middle and/or end |
One of these was weak |
Adequate presentation, but not inspiring |
Amateur |
No multimedia product (0 pts) |
Images unclear and the information was very difficult to read and follow |
Flow of presentation was very unclear |
Both of these were poor |
Presentation was weak, information was incomplete or incoherent |
Posted 5/18/02